To buy or not to buy that is the question


When it comes to buying or leasing your equipment, should your head be in the clouds or your hands in your pockets? Azule’s Peter Savage investigates...
As the theme of this month’s issue is archiving and storage, I thought it would be a good time to take a moment and look at different ways of acquiring the IT based storage and archiving assets on which our industry depends.
The traditional view in most businesses is that it is best to own your assets and make your capital work for the business, but with a growing trend towards outsourcing - especially with IT-related products – now is a good time to consider: Which of these paths is best you’re your business? In this article I’ve included a number of examples to help identify which solution would work best for you…
Not to buy - outsourcing
Let’s look first at cloud computing, which has been steadily gaining momentum in recent years. This is when a company uses a virtual IT system which it outsources from a larger IT service company. It can be especially useful for start-up businesses with low and uncertain storage and capacity requirements, and for businesses with fluctuating needs as the capacity can be scaled up or down easily and quickly to respond to changes in demand.
Tennis provides an example again…
A good example of cloud computing in practice is the official website for the Wimbledon Tennis Championships, which attracts a constant but relatively low amount of traffic for 50 weeks a year but sees a huge spike over the two weeks of the tournament. It would be highly uneconomic for Wimbledon to buy huge capacity just to accommodate its two-week spike, so it taps into a cloud system to meet the short-term demand and scales back when the winners have taken home their trophies.
So does the Beeb
The BBC is another good example of the trend towards outsourcing, seeming to have outsourced almost everything except its main salary bill. It currently outsources its transmission, IT systems, Outside Broadcasting and its buildings and facilities including the new flagship Media City development in Salford Quays.
Is outsourcing all good news?
Fervent outsourcers argue that - with a minimum annual cost commitment - companies can save money on capital equipment and instead use their resources and cash to optimise their income. For the BBC, it means that the licence fee can be used to create programmes and saleable content rather than buy and service buildings and IT systems – a sensible choice for a national broadcaster that relies on public money and the sale of its content for its income.
To buy – insourcing
Owning your assets, whether through cash or leasing, can give you several significant benefits.
You stay in control
Firstly, you are in control of your own equipment. Going back to the BBC, a national broadcaster should own the equipment it needs to provide a public service. In general, buying assets means that you can build your company on a self-sufficient basis, which, in certain circumstances, may work out be more prudent than the outsourcing model. It also retains a level of autonomy within your business, protecting against any potential issues that may arise for the outsource partners and safeguarding against he problems of non-supply.
Secondly, when you buy and own your assets they can generate more income than their cost to the business. Take this example from the world of leasing:
If a cameraman works for three days a week on various formats and rents a camera from a hire company at £300 (outsourcing), that would work out to £3,600 in camera hire each month. If the camera itself costs £40,000 which could cost around £1,300 a month on a three-year lease, it’s clear that the cameraman is better off buying the camera over three years (insourcing). After three years, the cameraman will own the camera outright and can generate extra income from either hiring or selling the camera himself.
Conversely, if a post house hires a mastering VTR three times a week and pays £250 a day (£3,250 a month) and the lease cost is £2,560 a month then the opposite is true - continuing to hire makes sense.
So the answer must lie somewhere between the two.
If you have fixed income based on hard assets that will retain their value after their useful life, the income it generates is higher than the cost of outsourcing, and you are able to purchase them over the same time frame then, economically speaking, you must purchase your assets.
On the other hand, if you have to invest huge sums on infrastructure that will devalue quickly, and your contracts are largely based on specialist skill sets rather than assets, then outsourcing is the best option.
Finally, in some cases, companies will be forced to purchase assets and this will always be more effective and tax efficient if done so with other people’s money. It would enable them to take ownership of the assets over their useful lifespan and retain high levels of cashflow within their business to aid expansion.
This is where leasing makes the most sense – but that is another article altogether...
If you would like to read other articles in this series, visit our website: www.azule.co.uk. If you would like advice on buying or leasing equipment, or on management and business issues, do email me on peter.savage@azule.co.uk and/or write to the TV bay editor.

Tags: azule | finance | iss045 | leasing | buying | outsourcing | insourcing | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • Azule Finance at BVE 2016

    Azule Finance at BVE 2016

  • Azule Finance at BVE 2013

    Azule Finance at BVE 2013

  • Five Arrows Media Finance at IBC 2015

    Five Arrows Media Finance at IBC 2015

  • Kit Financing with Medialease at NAB 2017

    Kit Financing with Medialease at NAB 2017


Related Shows
  • Paragon Bank Technology Finance at BVE 2016

    Paragon Bank Technology Finance at BVE 2016


Articles
Capturing Haute Couture
KitPlus As the fashion world returned to the French capital for the most prestigious of the 'Big Four’ fashion weeks, historical venues such as the Carrousel du Louvre and the Grand Palais played host to famous emblematic brands such as Chanel, Valentino, Louis Vuitton and Stella McCartney, showcasing their autumn/winter 2019 collections.
Tags: iss137 | blackmagic design | ursa mini | freecaster | atem | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read or download PDF
What is the JT-NM Tested Program
Bruce Devlin - new The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Show 2019 has come and gone with the usual onslaught of product announcements, launch parties, demonstrations and the usual high-density crowds preventing any high-speed movement between halls. The IP showcase, this year, featured a JT-NM tested program. If you're unfamiliar with the JT-NM, then it's worth checking out their website jt-nm.org where you can find out about the work being done to coordinate the different aspects of building an inter-working ST 2110 eco-system. The JT-NM tested program catalogue can be downloaded from the website and it highlights a series of tests that were performed prior to NAB on various products to see how they performed against the written standards upon which the ST 2110 eco system is based.
Tags: iss137 | st2110 | class | jt-nm | nab | ieee | secuirty | amwa | Bruce Devlin - new
Contributing Author Bruce Devlin - new Click to read or download PDF
Cinegy Channel Playout
David Wright Canis Television & Media is a UK-based specialist broadcast services company, providing its clients as a one-stop shop for everything from production facilities to asset valuations to traffic control. In response to growing demand from its clients, Canis identified a need for channel playout facilities.
Tags: iss137 | cinegy | canis media | David Wright
Contributing Author David Wright Click to read or download PDF
IMF Adoption
Howard Twine The Interoperable Master Format isn’t new. It’s been around for more than six years. Despite this longevity, the broad adoption since the publication of SMPTE 2067 has been pretty slow. This is perhaps more because of the age old mantra “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it,” than the ease with which many could interpret the standard. However, it is safe to say that movie producers blazed a trail in using IMF for original content delivery. Perhaps the key is that those early adopters didn’t have any significant tape based infrastructure that had been modified for file-based working when receiving content. So, many longer established content distributors have the immense resources to create the vast array of versions required to address the ‘version issue.’ This being how do you get the same content to look good on the back of an aeroplane seat headrest or an iPhone in the back of car as well as a good old TV set. Over time these resources have been diminishing and many organisations recognise that they have to adopt workflow automation to survive.
Tags: iss137 | editshare | imf | standards | smpte 2067 | Howard Twine
Contributing Author Howard Twine Click to read or download PDF
TV Futures - Producers Produce
Emily Merritt I’ve learnt two major facts about being a producer since studying on my BSc Television and Broadcasting course: ‘the role of producer cannot be defined in a sentence’ and ‘if your team don’t see you working, you’re doing your role as producer correctly’.
Tags: iss137 | portsmouth university | student | education | training | producer | Emily Merritt
Contributing Author Emily Merritt Click to read or download PDF