Ask the Experts - Loudness


TV-Bay Magazine
Read ezine online
Introduction:
Loudness level inconsistencies are one of the most common problems in the broadcast industry. Loudness standards are now being introduced as discontinuities in audio levels between programs, or between programs and advertisements, have been the cause of viewer complaints – in fact they are the number one cause. Of course anything that causes complaints is a concern to broadcasters – complaints mean dissatisfied customers, reduced revenue from subscriptions and lowered ads, and now with the introduction of legislation, fines.
Why should I care about the new loudness standards?
Loudness issues are not only limited to how loud a program is. A common issue concerns indistinct dialog, which makes it difficult to hear a program’s presenter or actors over the background soundtrack and music. In a recent example of this, a flagship popular science series on a major British TV channel was the subject of hundreds of complaints as viewers struggled to hear the presenter over an intrusive musical soundtrack. The audio for programs like this is mixed on high-quality studio systems and what sounds good to the engineer, may be very different on the low-fi sound reproduction from most TVs.
Another issue is audio quality, and the hyper-compression that crushes the dynamic range of the original audio source. Hyper-compressed audio sounds relentlessly loud and is very intrusive. The new standards remove the loudness advantage achieved with over compression and so a more dynamic mix becomes a viable, or even desirable alternative.
And finally everyone in broadcasting should care about the new standards, because in many countries they are now enshrined in the law and you'll be risking fines if you don't meet them.
But to put it at its simplest, better audio means happier viewers, as a recent example proves. An Italian broadcaster which was an early adopter of loudness technology found that its channels were quieter as a result, but its audience figures started rising because channel-hopping viewers noticed how harsh and noisy other channels sounded.
How widespread are the standards?
Standards are global, Asia and Africa excepted. Various names are used around the world for the standards but they are all essentially the same and are based on ITU-R B.S. 1770. There are some slight differences in interpretation but this doesn’t result in any notable difference in what the consumer perceives. In the USA the main measurement is called LKFS and in Europe it's referred to as LUFS, but it's essentially the same thing.
There are lots of different loudness readings. What are they all for and which one should I measure?
The main reading is integrated (or program) loudness – the overall average loudness of the content. Some standards aim for -24 LKFS, and for others it's -23 (the European LUFS measure usually). Beyond this there are quite a few more detailed measures including the short term loudness reading, which measures loudness over the past 3 seconds. Some broadcasters specify a value for this to meet targets for maximum short term loudness values. There is also the momentary loudness reading, which measures over a 0.4 second window. This value varies a lot during the course of a program and measuring it is a way of making sure no sudden peaks occur.
Another value, True Peak Level, is not strictly a loudness measure at all but a measurement of the inter-sample peak. Maximum peak measurement is specified in order to avoid noticeable clipping and distortion, but because of the way audio is sampled, the real audio level may have gone above the maximum peak level in between samples. True Peak Level is designed to measure that real level. It's important because broadcasters send their audio through various pieces of equipment which convert from D to A and back, and so during the conversions limit-exceeding peaks may be introduced, causing clipping. Converting from one codec to another may also introduce clipping. True Peak readings give better confidence that this will not happen.
Finally, LRA is a measurement of loudness range and this is only a useful measure on a longer piece of audio to give a reading of the difference between the main quieter and louder sections. This is very much a context-based measurement: cinema transmissions may have a value of 25, 20 or 15 LKs, but 20 would be way too much for television, where 15 to 5 would be appropriate.
How do I set my brick wall limiter to be safe enough? Are there any PPM or QPPM equivalents?
People who use brick wall limiting (very high ratio and fast attack times) to stay within peak level still may go above true peak level, and in fact the more you drive the brick wall, the more you are likely to produce True Peak Level clips. It’s impossible to set a brick wall to be safe enough and while you can get round this by using PPM or QPPM to add an extra margin as a safety net, this artificially limits the freedom you have in mastering. So the idea of the True Peak Level is that it allows more of the headroom to be used without the danger of introducing clipping.
What do current audio measurement tools provide for measuring and correcting loudness?
The tools from NUGEN Audio give an objective evaluation of the loudness according to how the ear perceives it. This is important because most audio measurement tools measure how loud the sound seems to the computer measuring it. To the ear, shouting can seem louder than a gunshot because it's more sustained, for example. For dialog clarity you could specify the minimum number of loudness units the dialog needs to be louder than the soundtrack, as an internal objective check listening subjectively and mixing on a high quality studio system, because the perceived separation may not be there on the small speakers in a consumer TV
NUGEN Audio produces a range of real time editor-based and file-based loudness analysis and correction tools, appropriate for scenarios from solo production engineers through ingest and right into broadcast edit suites. The products are designed to make the sometimes complex issues of loudness metering easier to negotiate, with intuitive solutions to get the problems solved rapidly. VisLM provides visual loudness metering with history and logging, standalone or editor-based plugin. LMB (Loudness management batch processor) is an automated file-based analysis and correction application. LMCorrect, an Avid editor based correction for ProTools and MediaComposer, provides analysis and automated correction. The choice of tool depends on the scenario: VisLM provides detailed analysis and is a mixing tool that can be used in real time to understand the loudness make up of your audio, while LMcorrect is more of a compliance tool.
What emerging trends are there?
The introduction of loudness standards has suddenly focused attention on audio quality in general, so other aspects of audio are now coming under the spotlight. Hyper-compression and unnecessary limiting is one of these. Much of the reason why adverts often appear so loud on television is because of the hyper-compression. It's a quality issue – advertisers all wanted their ads to be louder than everyone else’s. Now we should start to see much more attention paid to quality. Loudness range is objectively measurable with LRA, so we will be able to investigate situation sensitive dynamic range considerations: for example if you are sitting with your 5.1 system at home and everyone is quiet, you can have a very wide dynamic range. But if you are watching a podcast on the train, you need a low dynamic because of the background noise. These are all new possibilities opened up by loudness parameters. Another new trend will be the increased examination of surround sound and upmixing. The whole question of audio continuity is also likely to be raised to address the continuity of background noise and transitions between programs. There's a lot of opportunity to look at how the industry can make better audio.

Tags: iss067 | loudness | nugen audio | itu 1770 | itu 1771 | ppm | qppm | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Read this article in the tv-bay digital magazine
Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • VisLM Loudness Meter update from Nugen Audio at IBC 2019

    VisLM Loudness Meter update from Nugen Audio at IBC 2019

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

    Nugen Audio Loudness Meter, Halo Upmix and Halo Downmix at NAB 2018

  • Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Loudness Toolkit at BVE 2016

  • NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

    NUGEN Audio: Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2013

  • Product Updates to SAM-Q including MADI & Loudness and PAM-IP updates from TSL Products at IBC 2019

    Product Updates to SAM-Q including MADI & Loudness and PAM-IP updates from TSL Products at IBC 2019

  • NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

    NUGEN Loudness Toolkit at NAB 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

    NUGEN Audio at IBC 2015

  • NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

    NUGEN Audio at BVE 2015

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2014

  • NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

    NuGen Audio at IBC 2013

  • The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

    The Telos Alliance at IBC 2016

  • Wohler at IBC 2016

    Wohler at IBC 2016

  • RTW at IBC 2014

    RTW at IBC 2014

  • RTW at NAB 2014

    RTW at NAB 2014

  • Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

    Cobalt Digital at NAB 2014

  • TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

    TSL Products SAM1 MADI at BVE 2014

  • RTW at IBC 2013

    RTW at IBC 2013

  • TSL Products at NAB 2013

    TSL Products at NAB 2013

  • TSL Systems at BVE 2013

    TSL Systems at BVE 2013

  • TSL Products at BVE 2013

    TSL Products at BVE 2013

  • RTW at NAB 2012

    RTW at NAB 2012

  • Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

    Emotion Systems at NAB 2012

  • Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

    Triveni Digital at NAB 2012

  • Qualis at NAB 2012

    Qualis at NAB 2012

  • DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

    DK-Technologies at NAB 2012

  • TSL at BVE 2012

    TSL at BVE 2012

  • Sonifex at BVE 2012

    Sonifex at BVE 2012

  • Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

    Emotion Systems at BVE 2012

  • HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

    HHB and TC Electronic at BVE North2011

  • Junger Audio at IBC2011

    Junger Audio at IBC2011

  • Volicon at IBC2011

    Volicon at IBC2011

  • TC Electronic at IBC2011

    TC Electronic at IBC2011

  • Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

    Cobalt Digital at IBC2011

  • RTW at IBC2011

    RTW at IBC2011

  • DK Technology at IBC2011

    DK Technology at IBC2011

  • Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

    Linear Acoustic at IBC2011

  • 7.1.2 Dolby Atmos support by Halo from Nugen Audio at NAB 2017

    7.1.2 Dolby Atmos support by Halo from Nugen Audio at NAB 2017

  • Nugen Audio at IBC 2016

    Nugen Audio at IBC 2016

  • Nugen Audio at NAB 2016

    Nugen Audio at NAB 2016

  • Nugen Audio Halo Upmix at BVE 2016

    Nugen Audio Halo Upmix at BVE 2016

  • Nugen Audio at IBC 2012

    Nugen Audio at IBC 2012

  • Nugen Halo Upmix and AMB Updates at IBC 2017

    Nugen Halo Upmix and AMB Updates at IBC 2017

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011


Related Shows
  • Show 18 - April 24th 2013

    Show 18 - April 24th 2013


Articles
The Making of Zero
Keith and David Lynch

The Brothers Lynch explain how they created the sinister atmospheric world for their new sci-fi short

In a post-apocalyptic world where humankind has emerged victorious in a war against artificial intelligent machines, a young girl dares to venture into the unknown. This is Zero, the new sci-fi short film from acclaimed British writer-director duo The Brothers Lynch which has premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival.

Tags: iss139 | blackmagic design | davinci resolve | editing | grading | grade | mk2 zeiss | superspeeds | cinema 4d | molinaire | Keith and David Lynch
Contributing Author Keith and David Lynch Click to read or download PDF
To Remotely Go - TVFutures
Michael Parsons One of my biggest concerns as an academic responsible for the education of hundreds of students is the ‘appropriateness’ of much of the technology we purchase and implement within the curriculum. The last few years have seen tremendous change in all sorts of technologies, and the broadcast industry is just one sector that has seen some significant leaps in innovation.
Tags: iss139 | university | portsmouth | graduation | guildhall | newtek | streaming | pxw-fs7 | ndi | ip | ndihx ptz camera | Michael Parsons
Contributing Author Michael Parsons Click to read or download PDF
Keeping Pace with the Content Revolution
Kevin Fitzgerald These are uniquely challenging times for broadcasters and their technical teams. Not only are they having to negotiate the move to IP-based infrastructures and the introduction of new formats and techniques such as 4K and HDR, they are also having to generate more content than ever before to support OTT and web services as well as traditional linear broadcast.
Tags: iss139 | streamstar | streaming | case 800 | ipx | ipx-3g | Kevin Fitzgerald
Contributing Author Kevin Fitzgerald Click to read or download PDF
Original KVM or KVM over IP
Jochen Bauer Will the technology used in broadcasting solely consist of IP devices? For years, IP has been entering all areas of life. Especially control room applications as they are typically deployed in broadcasting benefit from the IP revolution in many ways. But an “IP-only broadcast world” is not yet here. Nevertheless, the trend clearly moves towards IP transmission, even though a large part of content production still uses traditional transmission paths. And therefore we continue to live in a hybrid world, using both original and IP-based technology. KVM experts Guntermann und Drunck still rely on both original KVM and KVM-over-IP™ to be able to offer their customers the best of both worlds.
Tags: iss139 | kvm | gdsys | guntermann and drunck | kvm-over-ip | Jochen Bauer
Contributing Author Jochen Bauer Click to read or download PDF
The Future of Broadcast Connectivity
Jamie Adkin The use of KVM equipment has been essential to meet the evolving needs of the broadcast industry for many years. Over that time, many in the industry have recognised the importance of using IP-enabled KVM to break down technological barriers and enable real-time access to visuals wherever and whenever they’re needed. These components are vital parts in live production environments in particular.
Tags: iss139 | adder | kvm | ip kvm | Jamie Adkin
Contributing Author Jamie Adkin Click to read or download PDF