A Guide to Testing IPTV: Technologies and Challenges Part 4


Testing IPTV Networks

The Technology Lifecycle
The deployment of new technologies tends to follow a similar lifecycle that begins with early research, development and standardisation and ends with full deployment and service management.

The lifecycle diagram illustrated in Figure 5 shows a number of different technologies moving through the design and deployment stages to a point where the services are fully operational and managed. The lifecycle itself consists of four distinct rings and it is important to note that any one technology may go round each ring a number of times as the technology advances and matures (or in some cases fails). As the technology progresses, the type of customer (e.g. Network Equipment Manufacturers (NEM)) and location (e.g. telecom Carrier Lab) tends to change.

As the technologies progress through the lifecycle there is a transition in the quality expectations delivered (shown on the right of the diagram). In the early stages, QoS parameters are significant as early researchers strive to get the base technologies to work (either standalone or interoperating with other equipment) and deliver the service. As the technology matures, and many of the QoS issues are resolved, the focus switches to optimising the QoE delivered to the subscriber, since it is this that will provide a differentiator between service providers.

In order to move efficiently and cost effectively through each stage of the lifecycle the need for testing and the selection of the right test equipment is essential. As illustrated, the test tools required through the lifecycle go from those that provide deep diagnostic capabilities (particularly in the early stages) to those capable of monitoring national and even global networks. Consistency of measurement becomes an important factor throughout the process if operators are to develop and deploy services quickly.


IPTV Test Methodology
Figure 6 shows an IPTV network reduced to its simplest form. In effect these systems consist of two key subsystems: the video headend, where video is ingested and made ready for transmission, and the IP network which is used to distribute the video along with voice and data services.

Design requires in-depth tests for standards compliance and interoperability of video and network infrastructure equipment. Manufacturing requires consistent, rapid and repeatable functional test and results logging. Early deployment and trialling requires tools that provide rapid fault identification and diagnosis of IP, video and voice faults.

For full deployment and ongoing system management the emphasis will shift from monitoring and testing parts of the network to 24/7 real-time monitoring of the whole network (which could be global).

Today total IPTV subscriber numbers remain low, and although IPTV networks have been in operation for a while, most are still in their early stages. The key objective during this phase is for operators to “get it working”.

There are three key steps that need to occur during this phase of deployment:

1. Can the “IP Pathway” be reliably set up and torn down? A triple play network needs to assure availability of network resources and bandwidth to deliver video services; however, as video is bandwidth intensive, it is equally important to ensure that pathways that are no longer needed can be torn down successfully. This requires test equipment capable of establishing and testing the IP pathway and providing statistics on network jitter and packet loss.

2. Is the video correct at the source and destination? Once the IP pathway is established it is then essential that the video data pushed into and received from the pathway is correct. This requires the monitoring and analysis of the Transport Streams at the output of encoders and multiplexers at the Headend. At the receiver end, similar monitoring and analysis is required to ensure there has been no degradation of the video as it passes through the system.
When discussing IPTV, it is also important to consider the ingest and storage facilities within the Headend (these are often overlooked). Significant amounts of content to be distributed through the system are ingested over RF, and the integrity of these links is as important as any other in the chain. Being at the front end of the transmission chain, any errors introduced at this stage will be propagated throughout the system. Similarly, much of the video content is stored on servers prior to playout into the system; corruption of the stored video can also lead to the propagation of poor video through the system.

3. Is it a great subscriber experience? The final stage of the early deployment phase is to configure the system to deliver a high QoE. This requires the optimisation of Control Plane (IGMP and RTSP) parameters. Engineers are required to ensure that the requested channels are actually delivered and there is access to the Electronic Programme Guide, etc. This can be an iterative process and will have to be repeated as new services are added, and the system scales up to cater for larger numbers of subscribers.

Throughout these stages engineers require test equipment that brings the broadcast and telecom’s worlds together. The equipment is required to perform comprehensive QoS (e.g. network jitter, lost packets), and QoE (e.g. IGMP response, PCR jitter) measurements. To aid rapid fault isolation and diagnosis, the ability to see and correlate errors across the different layers of the network is essential. Not all errors that occur on the IP layer cause video errors. It is important to understand which do, and which do not.
Multi-layer Monitoring
In a monitoring system, each monitoring device can be considered a probe, monitoring quality at a particular point and layer in the distribution and transmission chain, however probing at only one layer can give a misleading picture of system health.

To be confident that their facilities are performing correctly and efficiently, operators will generally need to probe at multiple layers in their systems. This type of test methodology is known as “multi-layer” monitoring, and allows operators to gain a complete picture of system quality, and to quickly detect and isolate quality problems. Figure 7 shows a small sample of multi-layer test/monitoring points.

This type of multi-layer testing will become more important as IPTV deployments mature and move into the Operate and Manage phase of the lifecycle, and the test emphasis shifts from deep analysis and diagnostics to one of 24/7 monitoring.



****

Throughout this article series we have uncovered a myriad of technological challenges faced by IPTV engineers and operators, and have highlighted the importance of effective test and measurement for the successful deployment of IPTV networks. In the final part of this series, we will provide some examples of specific test and measurement technologies which can be used to help engineers and operators to successfully design, build, monitor and expand these networks.

Tags: iptv | tektronix | iss034 | iptv network | test and measurement | ip pathway | multi-layer monitoring | N/A
Contributing Author N/A

Article Copyright tv-bay limited. All trademarks recognised.
Reproduction of the content strictly prohibited without written consent.

Related Interviews
  • VITEC EZTV Lite Platform for IPTV and digital Signage at ISE2020

    VITEC EZTV Lite Platform for IPTV and digital Signage at ISE2020

  • VITEC IPTV Digital Wall and Digital Signage Platform at ISE 2019

    VITEC IPTV Digital Wall and Digital Signage Platform at ISE 2019

  • VITEC EZ TV IPTV and Digital Signage Platform at NAB 2019

    VITEC EZ TV IPTV and Digital Signage Platform at NAB 2019

  • IPTV Digital Signage from VITEC at NAB 2017

    IPTV Digital Signage from VITEC at NAB 2017

  • Elemental Technologies news at IBC 2015

    Elemental Technologies news at IBC 2015

  • Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

    Thomson Video Networks at IBC 2014

  • BBright at IBC 2014

    BBright at IBC 2014

  • Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

    Viaccess-Orca at IBC 2014

  • Perception at NAB 2014

    Perception at NAB 2014

  • Elemental Technologies Software-Defined Video at NAB 2014

    Elemental Technologies Software-Defined Video at NAB 2014

  • Elemental Technologies HEVC solutions at NAB 2014

    Elemental Technologies HEVC solutions at NAB 2014

  • Elemental Technologies Multiscreen Solutions at NAB 2014

    Elemental Technologies Multiscreen Solutions at NAB 2014

  • Haivision on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

    Haivision on BroadcastShow LIVE at IBC 2013

  • Albis Technologies celebrating ten years at IBC 2013

    Albis Technologies celebrating ten years at IBC 2013

  • Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

    Bridge Technologies QoE Monitoring with Mobile Videowall Display at IBC 2013

  • Visionary Solutions at NAB 2013

    Visionary Solutions at NAB 2013

  • Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

    Telestream Vantage v5 at NAB 2013

  • Visionary Solutions at NAB 2012

    Visionary Solutions at NAB 2012

  • Tektronix at IBC2011

    Tektronix at IBC2011

  • Tektronix at IBC 2016

    Tektronix at IBC 2016

  • Tektronix at IBC 2015

    Tektronix at IBC 2015

  • Tektronix at IBC 2014

    Tektronix at IBC 2014

  • Tektronix at IBC 2013

    Tektronix at IBC 2013

  • Phabrix RX2000 at NAB 2013

    Phabrix RX2000 at NAB 2013

  • Phabrix at BVE 2012

    Phabrix at BVE 2012

  • Sencore at IBC2011

    Sencore at IBC2011

  • Leader at IBC2011

    Leader at IBC2011

  • Murraypro at IBC2011

    Murraypro at IBC2011

  • Hamlet at IBC2011

    Hamlet at IBC2011

  • Phabrix at IBC2011

    Phabrix at IBC2011


Related Shows
  • Kiloview Video Converter Decoder Converter Live Streaming with Digi-Box

    Kiloview Video Converter Decoder Converter Live Streaming with Digi-Box


Articles
Cloud integration: The only way is up
Francois Vaillant

In 2017 we saw the introduction of SMPTE 2110 and since then, the transition to IP has emerged as a priority for broadcasters looking to streamline their operations, decrease their footprint and effectively integrate with an industry in a rapid state of flux. A 2020 survey by Devoncroft found that almost 20% of broadcasters had already deployed SMPTE 2110, and over 25% were planning to do so. Then came the pandemic, precipitating the need for on-the-fly collaboration and accelerating the transition to remote, virtual and cloud production.

Tags: dejero | smpte 2110 | dazzl | streaming | Francois Vaillant
Contributing Author Francois Vaillant Click to read
The Cloud - a measured approach
Ciaran Doran

With the buzz of ‘cloud’ everywhere in our industry it would be natural to think that cloud is the only game in town. Isn’t it time to step back and consider very carefully how, or whether, you make that journey to the cloud?

Tags: cloud | rohde and schwarz | rohde | schwarz | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Meeting the specification
Chris Smeeton

A good technical specification will detail precisely what is required, from the equipment to the cables connecting it. Many specifications will give  particular manufacturers and model numbers. On many occasions, this makes tendering simple and gives vendors a secure and fair way to bid.

Tags: CPR specification | argosy cable | fire safe cable | eu standard cable | chris smeeton | Chris Smeeton
Contributing Author Chris Smeeton Click to read
Avid and Rohde & Schwarz
Ciaran Doran

Rohde & Schwarz is the perfect ingest partner to build flexible workflows with Avid.

Tags: Rohde and Schwarz | avid | spycernode | editing | asset management | venice | Ciaran Doran
Contributing Author Ciaran Doran Click to read
Sennheiser MKE 400 hands on review and test
KitPlus

Sennheiser have just released two products aimed at simplifying audio on the move, the MKE400 shotgun microphone and the XS Lav Mic, in this review we’re looking at the MKE400.

Tags: sennheiser mke400 | sennheiser mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 quality | best microphones for youtube | mic for youtube videos | sennheiser mke 400 hands on | microphone review | iphone videography | microphones | sound for video | camera microphone | microphone for iphone | microphone for youtube | video microphone | shotgun mics | smartphone microphone | vlogging mic | best microphone for video | shotgun microphone review | mke 400 | sennheiser mke 400 hands on review | sennheiser mke 400 test | KitPlus
Contributing Author KitPlus Click to read